![]() ![]() Potential for Football success relative to Conference USA peers.Perceptions about the quality of the institution’s brand.President, Trustees, C-Suite) in support of the athletic program Perceptions about institutional leadership (e.g.Perceptions about the ability to generate donor & corporate support for the athletics program.Athletics facilities relative to Conference USA peers.Likelihood of a change in conference affiliation during the next two years.The ten variables independently measured and utilized to determine the rankings include: ![]() The data was used to provide detailed insights about the potential for success at each school. Rather, it is an assessment of the opportunity generally through the eyes of both peers and aspirants to the position were it to become available.ĭozens of sitting Athletic Directors or executive-level administrators who currently are or could soon be a Conference USA AD were invited to share feedback on each AD job in the league. It’s imperative to note the Athletic Department Power Index is not intended or developed to analyze the performance or potential of the current Athletic Director at the respective institutions. The Athletic Department Power Index will evaluate the desirability of Athletic Director jobs in every Division I conference across the country. The AthleticDirectorU Athletic Department Power Index, powered by Athlete Viewpoint, continues with a look at Conference USA. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |